SQL Compare 3.0 and Indexes
Brian Donahue
Posts: 6,590 Bronze 1
Hi Dietmar,
That's a good idea. We will be adding an option to ignore the statistics
in a future version. It won't be in time to make it into the next release,
unfortunately.
Thanks,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Dietmar Craul" <d_Craul@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pOxy5QhnDHA.1492@server53...
> Hi,
>
> I am just evaluating V3.0 and it seems to be a great product, though in my
> opinion it has a great disadvantage to older versions (the last I looked
at
> is V1.4 or something like that). When comparing database tables and
> including index information also the statistics are included in the
> comparison.
> In my opinion it should be made optional to include / exclude the
> statistics, but still be able to compare indexes.
>
> At present I get numerous differences listed, only because different
> machines list differenct statistics on fields.
>
> Or is there a way ... to remove this from the comparison?
>
> Regards
> Dietmar
>
>
That's a good idea. We will be adding an option to ignore the statistics
in a future version. It won't be in time to make it into the next release,
unfortunately.
Thanks,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Dietmar Craul" <d_Craul@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pOxy5QhnDHA.1492@server53...
> Hi,
>
> I am just evaluating V3.0 and it seems to be a great product, though in my
> opinion it has a great disadvantage to older versions (the last I looked
at
> is V1.4 or something like that). When comparing database tables and
> including index information also the statistics are included in the
> comparison.
> In my opinion it should be made optional to include / exclude the
> statistics, but still be able to compare indexes.
>
> At present I get numerous differences listed, only because different
> machines list differenct statistics on fields.
>
> Or is there a way ... to remove this from the comparison?
>
> Regards
> Dietmar
>
>
This discussion has been closed.
