Ignoring Triggers
wamanring
Posts: 7 Bronze 1
I would like to know if it is possible to ignore a specifc trigger, as opposed to ignoring all DML triggers.
Another option which would also solve my problem would be to be able to ignore a specific item in the dependency list, as opposed to having to include/exclude all dependencies.
Thanks.
Another option which would also solve my problem would be to be able to ignore a specific item in the dependency list, as opposed to having to include/exclude all dependencies.
Thanks.
Bill
Comments
I have submitted the following Feature Requests for the development to consider:
"I would like to know if it is possible to ignore a specifc trigger, as opposed to ignoring all DML triggers. " - Reference Number is SC-4449
"Another option which would also solve my problem would be to be able to ignore a specific item in the dependency list, as opposed to having to include/exclude all dependencies. " - Reference Number is SC-4450
I cannot guarantee that the above feature requests will be successful or if approval is given, what future version of SQL Compare they appear in. I will be maintaining a watch on both feature request submitted and can update you on the progress of each feature request submitted.
Many Thanks
Eddie
Senior Product Support Engineer
Redgate Software Ltd
Email: support@red-gate.com
This is still not prioritized on the immediate roadmap. Treating DML triggers as objects in their own right would be a significant architectural change so we need a lot more user demand to justify the effort at which point we'll reconsider this. The option to selectively pick dependent objects to bring in sounds like a more plausible option. However, excluding the trigger would also mean exclude the table it is attached to, rather than the trigger alone. Would this present a problem?
Kind regards,
David Atkinson
Product Manager
Red Gate Software
Product Manager
Redgate Software
Thanks for the prompt response.