Project option: Ignore Temporal artifacts
billinkfc
Posts: 1 Bronze 1
in SQL Compare
For "reasons" we have our development environment created without temporal accoutrement. Once tables are promoted out of the development tier, we need to have those tables defined as temporal tables.
I'd like to see in a future version of SQL Compare a project option that ignores the row start/row end and period specifications. As it stands now, I have 1276 tables that differ between Dev and QA. I *think* every one of those changes is due to the temporal specifications but it's going to be a bear going through that change script.
Every time I need to sync environments, I will need to repeat this painful process. Currently, I'm looking at emitting the change set to xml and shredding that and discarding temporal changes but that just smacks of "I'm going to miss a case, might not even be a corner case"
Again, reasons for why we have to have the environments set up and changing the product will be easier than their process. Not good reasons mind you, but standard, unfathomable and unyielding corporate "reasons."
I'd like to see in a future version of SQL Compare a project option that ignores the row start/row end and period specifications. As it stands now, I have 1276 tables that differ between Dev and QA. I *think* every one of those changes is due to the temporal specifications but it's going to be a bear going through that change script.
Every time I need to sync environments, I will need to repeat this painful process. Currently, I'm looking at emitting the change set to xml and shredding that and discarding temporal changes but that just smacks of "I'm going to miss a case, might not even be a corner case"
Again, reasons for why we have to have the environments set up and changing the product will be easier than their process. Not good reasons mind you, but standard, unfathomable and unyielding corporate "reasons."
Answers
Redgate Software