possible to profile WebService called from VB6 EXE?
Brian Donahue
Posts: 6,590 Bronze 1
Hi Dennis,
There is a slight difference in the way that WebApps/Services are
profiled as opposed to Windows Applications. For that reason, if you are
profiling a web service, you have to select the option 'I want to profile
all web sites and web services' in Profiler's project settings, then start
your VB6 project from outside ANTS Profiler (using the VB IDE or launch via
an icon, etc.). All of the calls to the web service should be profiled if
you do it this way.
Yours,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Dennis LeFever" <dlefever@hc2000inc.com> wrote in message
news:q8fkJShqDHA.1740@server53...
> Is it possible to profile a WebService that is called from a VB6 EXE? I
set
> the project run the VB6 EXE as the test harness, but get no results. (I
> have tried "taking measurements immediately" and not.) I do get results
> when running the test page in IE.
>
> I have v1.0 and 1.1 of the Framework installed and registered w/ IIS.
Using
> .Net 2003 on Win2k.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
>
>
There is a slight difference in the way that WebApps/Services are
profiled as opposed to Windows Applications. For that reason, if you are
profiling a web service, you have to select the option 'I want to profile
all web sites and web services' in Profiler's project settings, then start
your VB6 project from outside ANTS Profiler (using the VB IDE or launch via
an icon, etc.). All of the calls to the web service should be profiled if
you do it this way.
Yours,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Dennis LeFever" <dlefever@hc2000inc.com> wrote in message
news:q8fkJShqDHA.1740@server53...
> Is it possible to profile a WebService that is called from a VB6 EXE? I
set
> the project run the VB6 EXE as the test harness, but get no results. (I
> have tried "taking measurements immediately" and not.) I do get results
> when running the test page in IE.
>
> I have v1.0 and 1.1 of the Framework installed and registered w/ IIS.
Using
> .Net 2003 on Win2k.
>
> Thanks,
> Dennis
>
>
This discussion has been closed.