Ignore columns for comparision
![Brian Donahue](https://us.v-cdn.net/6029854/uploads/defaultavatar/nZUSABQN8JEE0.jpg)
Hi Joe,
It's an easy setting to miss unfortunately. It's pretty well hidden.
Regards,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Joe Ahmann" <ahmannj@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:V2qp2GjfEHA.1620@server53...
> Forget this post - I missed seeing the feature... Seems that I didn't
scroll
> the table list far enough to the right.... Doh!
>
>
> "Joe Ahmann" <ahmannj@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kwBkHFjfEHA.2700@server53...
> > I like to have the ability to specifiy which columns to include in (or
in
> my
> > case exclude from) the comparison.
> > We track auditing information in a set of columns in each table and
these
> > can vary, while the "real" data in the tables needs to stay static.
Since
> > the audit columns vary, I get rows that do not match - it would be nice
to
> > automatically ignore them.
> > Does this make sense?
> >
> >
>
>
It's an easy setting to miss unfortunately. It's pretty well hidden.
Regards,
Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support
"Joe Ahmann" <ahmannj@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:V2qp2GjfEHA.1620@server53...
> Forget this post - I missed seeing the feature... Seems that I didn't
scroll
> the table list far enough to the right.... Doh!
>
>
> "Joe Ahmann" <ahmannj@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kwBkHFjfEHA.2700@server53...
> > I like to have the ability to specifiy which columns to include in (or
in
> my
> > case exclude from) the comparison.
> > We track auditing information in a set of columns in each table and
these
> > can vary, while the "real" data in the tables needs to stay static.
Since
> > the audit columns vary, I get rows that do not match - it would be nice
to
> > automatically ignore them.
> > Does this make sense?
> >
> >
>
>
This discussion has been closed.