Options

Compare record subset...

Brian DonahueBrian Donahue Posts: 6,590 Bronze 1
Hi Martin,

I think we're getting there. The next release is going to allow you to
pick which records that you want to synchronize, but nothing as atomic as a
filter or query to specify which records to synchronize yet.

Regards,

Brian Donahue
Red Gate Technical Support

"Martin Larsen" <byld@DONT_SPAM_ME_hardworking.dk> wrote in message
news:udZdj0BDEHA.1220@server53...
> Hi.
>
> I have a request...:)
>
> It would be VERY nice if you could have a option to filter the tables you
> are comparing...
> I have 2 tables with a lot of records in, and I want to sync only part of
> the differences...
> So if I could attach a sql filter on the tables when SQL Data Compare is
> getting the rows
> it would solve my problem ...
>
>
> Regards
> Martin Larsen
>
>

Comments

  • Options
    Martin,

    The next release will also support indexed views so you'll be able to
    achieve it that way too.

    Yours,

    Neil
    "Brian Donahue (Red Gate)" <brian.donahue@red-gate.com> wrote in message
    news:Da6wf8dDEHA.1520@server53...
    > Hi Martin,
    >
    > I think we're getting there. The next release is going to allow you to
    > pick which records that you want to synchronize, but nothing as atomic as
    a
    > filter or query to specify which records to synchronize yet.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Brian Donahue
    > Red Gate Technical Support
    >
    > "Martin Larsen" <byld@DONT_SPAM_ME_hardworking.dk> wrote in message
    > news:udZdj0BDEHA.1220@server53...
    > > Hi.
    > >
    > > I have a request...:)
    > >
    > > It would be VERY nice if you could have a option to filter the tables
    you
    > > are comparing...
    > > I have 2 tables with a lot of records in, and I want to sync only part
    of
    > > the differences...
    > > So if I could attach a sql filter on the tables when SQL Data Compare is
    > > getting the rows
    > > it would solve my problem ...
    > >
    > >
    > > Regards
    > > Martin Larsen
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    - Neil Davidson
    Red Gate Software Ltd
  • Options
    Should be in the next week or two.

    - Neil

    "Martin Larsen" <byld@DONT_SPAM_ME_hardworking.dk> wrote in message
    news:JTGxTV$DEHA.1504@server53...
    > Hi...
    >
    > Sounds great :)
    >
    > And now for the 100000$ question...
    > Any idea when that version will be released ?
    >
    > Regards
    > Martin
    >
    > "Neil Davidson" <neil.davidson@red-gate.com> wrote in message
    > news:og2O75%23DEHA.1504@server53...
    > > Martin,
    > >
    > > The next release will also support indexed views so you'll be able to
    > > achieve it that way too.
    > >
    > > Yours,
    > >
    > > Neil
    > > "Brian Donahue (Red Gate)" <brian.donahue@red-gate.com> wrote in message
    > > news:Da6wf8dDEHA.1520@server53...
    > > > Hi Martin,
    > > >
    > > > I think we're getting there. The next release is going to allow
    you
    > to
    > > > pick which records that you want to synchronize, but nothing as atomic
    > as
    > > a
    > > > filter or query to specify which records to synchronize yet.
    > > >
    > > > Regards,
    > > >
    > > > Brian Donahue
    > > > Red Gate Technical Support
    > > >
    > > > "Martin Larsen" <byld@DONT_SPAM_ME_hardworking.dk> wrote in message
    > > > news:udZdj0BDEHA.1220@server53...
    > > > > Hi.
    > > > >
    > > > > I have a request...:)
    > > > >
    > > > > It would be VERY nice if you could have a option to filter the
    tables
    > > you
    > > > > are comparing...
    > > > > I have 2 tables with a lot of records in, and I want to sync only
    part
    > > of
    > > > > the differences...
    > > > > So if I could attach a sql filter on the tables when SQL Data
    Compare
    > is
    > > > > getting the rows
    > > > > it would solve my problem ...
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Regards
    > > > > Martin Larsen
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >
    - Neil Davidson
    Red Gate Software Ltd
This discussion has been closed.