Feature Request: Reverse Checkboxes or Objects not selected
alecl
Posts: 22
Often times the list of Objects NOT selected for synchronization may make a more interesting report than the objects selected.
This could either by support by having a "Reverse Selections" option of a report option for "Objects NOT selected for synchronization". The former is or even both would be preferred as that's more flexible.
Note: I am not asking about the reverse synchronization direction feature that is in there.
This could either by support by having a "Reverse Selections" option of a report option for "Objects NOT selected for synchronization". The former is or even both would be preferred as that's more flexible.
Note: I am not asking about the reverse synchronization direction feature that is in there.
Comments
I have submitted this Feature Request, the reference number is SC-5714.
You may also wish to post your suggestion on the SQL Compare Uservoice forum using this LINK.
The reason for making this recommendation, if there are other SQL Compare users who wish to see this feature be added to the product, they can then vote for this feature. The more votes the suggestion receives, the better the chance of seeing the feature added to a future version of SQL Compare.
Thank you for your suggestion.
Many Thanks
Eddie
Senior Product Support Engineer
Redgate Software Ltd
Email: support@red-gate.com
http://redgate.uservoice.com/forums/141 ... t-selected