HTML Output
Neil Davidson
Posts: 281
Hi Kevin,
This is going to be back in. We're releasing an update which will include
the HTML reports, hopefully this week.
Yours,
Neil Davidson
"Kevin Jones" <kevin.jones_at_tylertechnologies.com> wrote in message
news:lJYt0BFsDHA.2820@server53...
> In an older version of the SQL Compare, there was the option to have the
> schema differences output into HTML. This was really clean looking output
> that was very presentable. We even sent it to clients to show them
changes
> from one release of our product to the next.
>
> It seems that this feature has disappeared in the latest release. What is
> the likelihood that this can be rolled back into the product?
>
> The current release has the export to Word, but this (1) presupposes that
MS
> Word is installed on the box and (2) gives really hard to read output
> compared to the HTML that was there previously.
>
> On a little more aggressive note, why was this feature removed? I can't
> remember the last time a packaged product simply dropped a feature --
> especially a good one that was up-to-date with the technology of the
day --
> without announcement or user input. I'd like to see this feature come
back.
>
>
This is going to be back in. We're releasing an update which will include
the HTML reports, hopefully this week.
Yours,
Neil Davidson
"Kevin Jones" <kevin.jones_at_tylertechnologies.com> wrote in message
news:lJYt0BFsDHA.2820@server53...
> In an older version of the SQL Compare, there was the option to have the
> schema differences output into HTML. This was really clean looking output
> that was very presentable. We even sent it to clients to show them
changes
> from one release of our product to the next.
>
> It seems that this feature has disappeared in the latest release. What is
> the likelihood that this can be rolled back into the product?
>
> The current release has the export to Word, but this (1) presupposes that
MS
> Word is installed on the box and (2) gives really hard to read output
> compared to the HTML that was there previously.
>
> On a little more aggressive note, why was this feature removed? I can't
> remember the last time a packaged product simply dropped a feature --
> especially a good one that was up-to-date with the technology of the
day --
> without announcement or user input. I'd like to see this feature come
back.
>
>
- Neil Davidson
Red Gate Software Ltd
Red Gate Software Ltd
This discussion has been closed.
Comments