[SOLVED] Tables correctly "mapped" in settings, not af(...)

donbuz

Good Day everyone,

We are currently qualifying SQL Data Compare (8.0.2.5). We have created a project involving a comparison between 82 tables from our production server to a mirror dedicated to the sole purpose of reporting, on another server.

While the settings of the project correctly and automatically list our 82 tables as “Mapped”, after running the comparison, 3 of them are listed as “Could not be compared” – even though we are sure differences exist.

How is it that these 3 tables are not correctly processed?

Thanks for your time

donbuz

OK - my mistake, the comparison key was not automatically set and we had to define "Custom" one.

Regards